Federal Court rules government unlawfully licensed Globalive

The Federal Court has effectively restored the foreign ownership restrictions of Canada’s Telecommunications Act by quashing the federal government’s decision to licence foreign-owned wireless telecom Globalive.

“The Federal Court has said that Cabinet is not above the law,” says the President of Canada’s largest telecommunications union, Dave Coles.

“If Stephen Harper and his Cabinet want to change the Telecommunication Act, they have to have the guts to go before Parliament,” he said, noting that “the decision says ‘Cabinet mis-drected itself in law’.”

The Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada (CEP), ACTRA, and Friends of Canadian Broadcasting were intervenors in the case.

In December 2009, the federal government granted a wireless license to Globalive, a company backed by Egypt’s Orascom, overturning an earlier decision to block the permit by Canada’s broadcast regulator. The Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission had rejected the application on the grounds it violated rules banning foreign control of the sector.

“Overturning the Cabinet decision is a victory for Canadian ownership rules and a victory for Canadian culture,” said Stephen Waddell, ACTRA’s National Executive Director. “Globalive was potentially the beginning of the end of our foreign ownership laws, we’re ecstatic that the courts have stopped the train in its tracks.”

The cultural coalition had intervened on the same side as Telus and Public Mobile in opposing the government’s decision. However, they were the only ones to bring cultural concerns to the table, asserting that telecommunication companies have a responsibility under the Telecommunications Act to strengthen and safeguard Canadian cultural sovereignty.

Increasing convergence between telecom and broadcasting has made the need to maintain Canadian-ownership of both even more acute. In the few months since the cultural groups were granted standing in this case two major telecommunications companies have converged with broadcasters – Shaw with CanWest, and BCE with CTVglobemedia.

“Foreign ownership was a looming threat to our entire communications industry, our ability to control our media and to protect our culture,” added Ian Morrison, spokesperson for the Friends of Canadian Broadcasting. “The federal court’s assertion that our foreign ownership rules matter has brought a sigh of relief across our entire industry.”

Vodafone fined for spamming in Australia

VODAFONE Hutchison Australia and Coke have become been caught by an anti-spam law, prompting the Australian government to re-iterate that it will strongly impose the six-year-old law.
Vodafone agreed to pay $110,000 after it sent 100,000 text messages to Vodafone customers last October as part of a marketing campaign for Coca-Cola. Where the law is breached, the regulator has several options, including a formal warning, an enforceable undertaking, fines of up to $110,000 a day, and Federal Court action in the most extreme cases.
The Australian Communications and Media Authority investigated whether the messages breached the 2003 Spam Act because they did not give recipients a means to unsubscribe or contact the sender.
The messages was: ”Take a hint from your PC and reboot. You’ll work faster. Reclaim your lunch hour with a friend. Escape with a Coca-Cola lunch break.”
The payment was part of an enforceable undertaking by Vodafone Hutchison, which owns Vodafone, and the marketing companies New Dialogue and Big Mobile.
Vodafone Hutchison agreed to pay but it stated that it would continue marketing campaigns via mobile phones.
Interestingly, last month the Federal Court fined companies and individuals $15.75 million for spam text messages targeted at users of a dating website.

VODAFONE Hutchison Australia and Coke have become been caught by an anti-spam law, prompting the Australian government to re-iterate that it will strongly impose the six-year-old law.

Vodafone agreed to pay $110,000 after it sent 100,000 text messages to Vodafone customers last October as part of a marketing campaign for Coca-Cola. Where the law is breached, the regulator has several options, including a formal warning, an enforceable undertaking, fines of up to $110,000 a day, and Federal Court action in the most extreme cases.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority investigated whether the messages breached the 2003 Spam Act because they did not give recipients a means to unsubscribe or contact the sender.

The messages was: ”Take a hint from your PC and reboot. You’ll work faster. Reclaim your lunch hour with a friend. Escape with a Coca-Cola lunch break.”

The payment was part of an enforceable undertaking by Vodafone Hutchison, which owns Vodafone, and the marketing companies New Dialogue and Big Mobile.

Vodafone Hutchison agreed to pay but it stated that it would continue marketing campaigns via mobile phones.

Interestingly, last month the Federal Court fined companies and individuals $15.75 million for spam text messages targeted at users of a dating website.

Price war & the Indian regulator cause mobile stocks to tumble

The Indian mobile sector, a darling of the Indian stock markets has just fallen from grace. Fears that a renewed tariff war may bring its dream run of profit growth to an end and could force smaller players to sell out or shut shop has caused the leader, Bharti Airtel to lose 17% in two trading sessions. Reliance Communications has fallen 11% and Idea Cellular fell 8%.

Mobile tariffs in India are already the lowest in the world. On Monday, Reliance (RCOM) announced the slashing of tariffs across the board for local, roaming and long-distance calls to 50 paise, i.e under a cent per minute.

In addition to this, the Indian Telecom regulator suggested on Monday that telecom operators shift to per-second pricing as opposed to per-minute. After the Indian stock market got jittery with this announcement and telecom stocks started tumbling, the regulator (TRAI) was seen as diluting their position on this statement, stating that proposal on per-second billing was at an initial stage and too much was being read into the issue.

TRAI chairman J.S. Sarma also said that mobile operators were free to oppose the scheme and the regulator would consider their opinion during the consultation process.

Sunil Mittal, the chief of Bharti Airtel said tariffs were best left to market forces.

MVNO deal signed by Tele2 in Germany

www.WirelessFederation.com/news: Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO) agreement has been signed between Tele2 Telecommunications Services GmbH and VIAG Interkom in Germany as per which Tele2 will use Interkom’s wireless network to provide the air interface for Tele2′s fixed line customers.

With over 1 million residential and business fixed telephony customers, Tele2 is one of Germany’s largest Indirect Access Operators.

According to Lars-Johan Jarnheimer, President and CEO of Tele2 AB, Germany is the largest telecoms market in Europe and this MVNO will enable Tele2 to offer an attractively priced offering of both fixed and mobile services on one bill to its customers.

The MVNO is expected to be operational in Q2 2002.