Foreign funds traced in 2G scam, 31 firms under scan (India)
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Tuesday submitted their progress report on 2G scam stating that 31 firms have come under the scrutiny.
The agency placed its latest status report of its investigation in the scam in a sealed envelope before a bench comprising Justices G S Singhvi and A K Ganguly in which it has mentioned that it is seeking the help of foreign authorities in tracking the source of money.
According to Senior Advocate, K K Venugopal, letters have been sent to Singapore, Cyprus, Jersey and Virgin Islands in connection with the 2G spectrum scam. Similar communications were being sent to two more countries.
He added that 31 companies have so far been summoned and statements of 26 companies have been recorded. Some Hawala operators were also involved in the scam and their premises were raided and they were questioned by the ED.
A bench of justices G S Singhvi and A K Ganguly had stated while asking the government to consider setting up of the court. They emphasised that a special court is a must if they want the objectives of the statue to be achieved. It cannot be done with existing manpower and infrastructure.
The Centre had then approached the Delhi High Court which, in consultation with the Chief Secretary of the city government, decided to set up the special court. The Centre would inform the apex court on Wednesday when the matter relating to CBI investigation comes up for hearing.
Reliance Communications hits out at ‘fraudulent’ rivals
Anil Ambani’s Reliance Communications has lashed out at “unscrupulous” and “fraudulent” rivals, escalating hostilities in what many say is aimed at turning the attention of investigators probing the telecom scandal away from itself and on to competitors such as Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Essar and Idea Cellular. RCOM’s head of wireless business, Syed Safawi, on Sunday accused rivals of ‘fraudulently misleading the government’ in connivance with ‘certain Department of Telecom (DoT) officials’ and causing ‘staggering losses’ to the state.
He said promoters of these rival firms had amassed personal fortunes running into more than Rs 1,00,000 crore during the past decade by their actions. While Safawi, who read out from a statement that was later mailed to the media, did not name any rivals and only referred to them as “old 2G operators,” a senior Anil Ambani group official said the reference was to firms such as Bharti, Vodafone and Idea. Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Essar declined to comment.
This surprise fusillade of allegations came as shares in all Anil Ambani group firms were battered last week, with RCOM falling to a record low amid speculation that CBI officials investigating the multi-billion dollar telecom scandal were soon likely to question its officials. Shares in RCOM, closed last week at Rs 97.15, off record lows but down from the . 160-level they traded three months ago. RCOM said while the CBI was examining “certain employees of the Reliance ADA group,” the investigations were by no meant restricted to its executives and had covered more than 50 people from across a large number of telecom operators.
The CBI has already arrested former telecom minister A Raja and Shahid Balwa, the founder of the erstwhile Swan Telecom. The Comptroller & Auditor General has pegged losses to the government because of this scandal at . 176,000 crore. RCOM has had past links with Swan, now renamed Etisalat DB Telecom , after UAE’s Etisalat bought a stake in the company. Balwa is one of the founders of DB Realty, a Mumbaibased property developer. The Anil Ambani group held a 9.9 percent stake in Swan Telecom when the latter applied for licences in March 2007, but says it sold its shares before Swan was awarded telecom licences in January 2008.
An RCOM official, Hari Nair, held the position of Swan’s company secretary, but the company says he “ceased to hold the post well before a licence was granted to Swan Telecom.” RCOM declined to disclose Nair’s present role. RCOM said it was a victim of a “malicious campaign of disinformation, falsehoods and calumny” being spread by rivals and accused the socalled “old 2G operators” of obtaining licences without any auction process and without paying any licence fees in 1994-95 . But some experts differed with its argument.
“Reliance had ample and equal opportunity to obtain these very 2G metro licences that its competitors Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Essar acquired. These metro licences may have been cheap but they were given through an open process,” said Mahesh Uppal, director at Com First India. “On the contrary, few would consider that the process to award dual technology licences was fair or transparent. It would be difficult to argue that Reliance’s competitors had advantages over it in either licensing or allocation of 2G spectrum.” But RCOM said the award of dual technology licence to it was legal and had been upheld by the Delhi High Court and by the TDSAT.
Delhi High Court refuses dismissal of claims against Etisalat DB Telecom (India)
Etisalat DB Telecom’s appeal to drop a court case has been rejected by the Delhi High Court. There had been claims that the company’s director, Shahid Balwa had links to a known Indian criminal, Dawood Ibrahim – but the company stated that investigation by the Maharashtra government and the Intelligence Bureau had found no such evidence.
The Court rejected a request for a summary dismissal and retained the original court hearing for next month.
In an application filing, Etisalat DB’s director claimed that the Anti-Terror Squad of Mumbai police and Intelligence Bureau had found no documents against him and despite the report, the Centre has failed to file any affidavit so far.
He claimed that the reports about the links with the criminal underworld had harmed the company and had led to banks withdrawing the agreed lines of credit needed to fund the network expansion.
The company is also facing investigations over its license awards as part of the ongoing telecoms scandal that has engulfed the country’s government.
Delhi HC rejects Etisalat’s early hearing plea (India)
The Delhi High Court has rejected the plea of the India Director of Etisalat DB Telecom for an early disposal of his petition claiming that the Maharashtra government and the Intelligence Bureau (IB) found no evidence against him of his alleged link with underworld don Dawood Ibrahim.
Justice S Muralidhar dismissed an application filed by Shahid Usman Balwa seeking the court to pre-pone the hearing of his petition which was fixed for March 7.
The UAE-based Etisalat DB Telecom Company (Swan Telecom) is facing CBI and ED probes in 2G spectrum allocation scam.
Filing an application, Balwa claimed that the Anti-Terror Squad of Mumbai police and IB, after a thorough inquiry, have found no documents against him and despite the report the Centre has failed to file any affidavit so far.
Seeking the court to allow his plea for a restraint on the Centre from making any allegations of linking him with Dawood Ibrahim, Balwa stated that due to such allegations he has been facing huge embarrassment in social and business circles. As a result of wrongful and defamatory allegations, grave prejudice and loss is being caused to him.
Balwa further stated that due to the allegations against him, some banks have cancelled the loan sanctioned to his company and also withdrawn the credit facilities sanctioned to his companies promoted by the petitioner.
No more ‘Bling’ in Micromax (India)
The Delhi High Court has restrained India’s second-largest mobile phone brand Micromax from selling or advertising one of its largest-selling women-oriented mobile phones ‘Bling’ as it acceded to a trademark violation filed by Delhi-based mobile phone maker Bling Telecom.
As per reports the court restrained Micromax, including its employees, agents, representatives, or anyone acting on their behalf, from using the trademark ‘Bling’ or any other name confusingly similar till the next date of hearing, February 8, 2011.
The court order, dated October 19, restrains the company from displaying the Bling ads on TV and print.
According to Bling Telecom chairman Rajiv Khanna, the company had filed for the trademark in July 2009 and has since introduced six models under the brand name. The company is the prior users of the trademark ‘Bling’ in relation to telecom goods such as mobile phones, and the use of the mark Bling by Micromax for mobile phones are without the company’s consent. Bling Telecom also sells mobile phones under the brand name Movil in India.
In contrast, Micromax has become the second-largest mobile phone seller in India after Nokia in two-and-a-half years of the company’s advent in the US$6510.99 million Indian handset market.

