GSM operators to surrender excess spectrum in 2014 (India)

If reports are to be believed, all leading GSM operators will have to give up excess airwaves they have when their mobile permits come up for renewal beginning 2014.

It means companies such as Bharti Airtel, Vodafone Essar and Idea Cellular, amongst others, which currently have up to 10 MHz or units of 2G airwaves in many regions, will be given only 6.2 units of radio frequencies when they renew their permits. Besides, telecom companies will also have to pay market rates for this 6.2 MHz of airwaves in every region when they renew their licences.
This has already been communicated to all mobile phone companies. According to DoT, on renewal, spectrum is to be assigned maximum up to the prescribed limit. Value of spectrum to be paid separately. Communications minister Kapil Sibal would be engaging the industry in a full-fledged discussion beginning this week.

At present, telcos hold separate permits for each of the 22 circles in the country and these are valid for a period of 20 years. The government gave away mobile permits from mid-90s. About 11 mobile phone companies will have to renew their permits between 2014 and 2021.

Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan heading towards 100% penetration

Mobile penetration in two central Asian countries is nearing 100% following healthy growth over the past decade. New information from Research and Markets details the telecommunications sectors in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan.

The telecommunications sector in Kyrgyzstan is characterized by an open market that has welcomed both foreign and domestic investors. This has been effectively done in accordance with the requirements set down by the WTO.

Under the terms of the country’s accession to the WTO (which took place in 1998), full liberalization of the telecoms market had been expected to be achieved by end-2006. According to the ITU, Kyrgyzstan had implemented full competition across all segments of its telecoms sector by 2007.

The telecom sector has been part of the final phase of a large scale privatization program that has been steadily progressing in the country since 1992. The start of market reforms in 1991 saw the state telecommunications agency, Kyrgyztelecom, begin to expand and upgrade its legacy telecom network, which at the time was outdated and poorly distributed. With the expansion of the telecoms sector, upgraded standards have been adopted.

At the same time, a new regulatory authority – the National Communications Agency which later became known as the National Agency for Information Resources, Technologies and Communication – was set up to oversee the sector.

At an early stage, Kyrgyztelecom was restructured as a public corporation and the government moved towards a partial sale of the operator to the private sector. Around 10% of the company quickly passed into private hands. By mid-2010, after a series of failed attempts to sell off the government shareholding, the government was still holding almost 78% of Kyrgyztelecom.

Private operators, which actively operate in the mobile market and in the provision of Internet services, have been investing heavily in the relevant infrastructure. Whilst there are four mobile networks in operation, the two big GSM operators, Bitel and MegaCom, have been dominating the market, between them claiming 86% of the total mobile subscriber base by March 2009.

Since the first GSM network was launched in 1998, the number of mobile subscribers has grown rapidly from a few thousand in 1999 to around 4.3 million in early 2010. By this stage it was heading for 100% penetration (probably achieving this in early 2011). Growth in the country’s mobile market into 2010 remained moderate compared with the general growth in recent years. Nonetheless, there are positive indications that the market will continue to steadily expand for some time yet.

Meanwhile, Kazakhstan has been experiencing a booming telecom market that included almost 100% mobile penetration by early 2010, despite growth slowing in 2009. This has come about on the back of a growing economy and a program of positive regulatory reform in the telecom sector. Legislation adopted in 2004 laid the foundation for the liberalization and development of the telecom sector and put an end to the monopoly enjoyed by Kazakhtelecom, the state-controlled telecom operator.

The rapid and successful development of telecommunications in the country encouraged several foreign suppliers to establish a presence in this emerging market. Since 1992, international operators and manufacturers have been active in Kazakhstan in providing services and installing state-of-the-art equipment, especially as part of the country’s international telecom network. Companies such as Motorola, Lucent, Siemens, Alcatel, Nokia, Daewoo and Nortel Networks have all been active in the market. Recognizing the long-term potential of this market, many foreign telecom companies were looking to invest and form partnerships with local telecom companies.

By 2005 four private operators had been licensed to provide international and long-distance services in competition with the incumbent Kazakhtelecom. They were state-railway subsidiary TransTelecom, KazTransCom (a subsidiary of the national oil company), Ducat and Astel. Up to 1,500 new telecoms service providers of various kinds had been licensed by end-2005.

The key drivers in the telecom sector included:

  • the deployment of Kazakhtelecom’s fully-digital national telecom network based on local and long-distance switches and fibre optic lines linking all major cities in the country;
  • efforts to improve international connectivity and increase both mobile and fixed-line subscribers;
  • the continuing digitalization of exchanges;
  • the further reform of telecommunications legislation;
  • the process of accession to the World Trade Organization. Kazakhstan had a relatively strong fixed-line penetration (24 telephone lines per 100 inhabitants by end-2009), with six operators providing fixed-line telephone services to about 3.8 million subscribers.

There had been long waiting lists for fixed-line telephone services over the years. The country’s mobile market entered a boom phase in 2000, no doubt boosted to some extent by the long delays in obtaining fixed-line services. The number of mobile services had exceeded fixed-lines by late 2004. Demand for mobile services was so strong that in 2006 that the government went on to auction a third GSM license (and fourth mobile operator license), which was duly awarded to NeoTelecom, a subsidiary of Kazakhtelecom. NeoTelecom then launched its mobile service in early 2007.

Of particular note has been the recent healthy growth in Internet activity in Kazakhstan, with the move to broadband access in particular taking place at a rapid rate. Broadband subscribers as a proportion of the population had reached 10% by early 2010, with the market likely to continue its expansion by 100% annually.

After Kazakhstan’s mobile market delivered annual growth of 36% in 2008, the 2009 year saw a major slowdown in the market with net growth almost negligible. With a mobile penetration approaching 100% in early 2010, the country’s mobile market was continuing to grow but was expected to start saturating in the not too distant future. Broadband Internet was quickly expanding on top of a general upturn in demand for Internet services, with the number of broadband subscribers increasing tenfold from a relatively small base in 2006/07, then doubling in 2008 and again in 2009.

There had been a significant shift to broadband access in 2009 as the proportion of Internet subscribers using broadband shifted from 43% to 76% in that twelve-month period. Kazakhstan, despite the considerable presence of incumbent Kazakhtelecom across the market, was continuing to benefit from a diversified market that offered an energetic and competitive environment, especially in respect of the mobile market.

On the economic front, after an eight-year period in which GDP had been growing at an annual rate in excess of 8%, 2008 saw a major slowdown in the Kazakhstan economy with GDP growth falling to 3%. 2009 saw growth fall even further (to around 1%) as the full impact of the global financial crisis hit.

GSM Operators want MNP to defer till Janaury (India)

GSM operators, like Vodafone, Bharti Airtel and Idea Cellular, have told the Department of Telecom (DoT) that mobile number portability (MNP) should not be launched before January.

According to them, as mobile networks are at peak usage in November and December due to the festival season, it will be difficult to implement the system.

The DoT was keen to introduce number portability in Haryana from November 25 and roll it out to the rest of the country by December.

According to GSM industry representative, if MNP is introduced now when their networks are running at a peak, it could affect the implementation. Consumers will suffer as the networks may not be able to offer quality service. They have been ready to implement MNP for the past one year but it was never introduced. Now when they are in a crucial period in terms of traffic growth, suddenly they want to introduce it.

But CDMA operators and new GSM players are ready for number portability. According to Mr S.C. Khanna, Secretary General, Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India, only the incumbent GSM operators have an issue. All the CDMA and new GSM operators are ready to start MNP by December. DoT should go ahead with it.

The GSM operators also claimed that as most of their network is outsourced to international companies, top engineers may not be available during the holiday season.

As per a GSM company, it is globally accepted that no one tinkers with the mobile network during these two months when a lot of executives take off for holidays. Introducing MNP now could actually make it a damp squib.

Azerfon receives first 3G license in Azerbaijan Republic

www.WirelessFederation.com/news: Azerfon became the first telecom operator of Azerbaijan Republic to receive 3G license. The service will be launched soon on the 2.1 Ghz frequency and will be available not only in Baku or Absheron peninsula but across the country. 11,000 manat (US$13,681) will be charged to all those operators granted with the license.

According to the Mobile World database, the country has three GSM operators and one CDMA operator. 8.1 million subscribers representing 78 percent of the population were recorded by the end of Q3 2009

India’s GSM subscriber base reaches 335.5 million

www.WirelessFederation.com/news: The GSM subscribers of India have grown by 9.31 million in August, taking its total base to 335.5 million, as per the data released.

According to the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), the apex body of GSM operators, Bharti Airtel remained the front runner with 2.8 million additions, taking its number of subscribers to 107.9 million.

Followed to this is Vodafone with the additon of 2.19 million, taking its subscriber tally to 80.8 million.

The monthly data does not include GSM subscribers of Reliance Communications and Tata Teleservices, which report figures separately, COAI said.

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) has gained 1.3 million subscribers, Idea Cellular added 1.5 million subscribers in August.

The GSM subscribers of India have grown by 9.31 million in August, taking its total base to 335.5 million, as per the data released.
According to the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), the apex body of GSM operators, Bharti Airtel remained the front runner with 2.8 million additions, taking its number of subscribers to 107.9 million.
Followed to this is Vodafone with the additon of 2.19 million, taking its subscriber tally to 80.8 million.
The monthly data does not include GSM subscribers of Reliance Communications and Tata Teleservices, which report figures separately, COAI said.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) has gained 1.3 million subscribers, Idea Cellular added 1.5 million subscribers in August.

Why Anil Ambani wants to ride two horses in telecom

: It happened almost simultaneously. Just when Reliance Communications applied to the government for a pan-India GSM spectrum, it announced a mega deal with Nokia for two million CDMA handsets.

The two parallel developments have sent out mixed signals to the industry on whether Anil Ambani’s Reliance Communications, which is the leading CDMA player with around 23 million subscribers, is interested in GSM or CDMA or both.

A few months ago, the company had applied for spectrum in six circles to operate GSM (global system for mobile communications) service. But it has now upped the ante by applying for a pan-India GSM presence, except in two circles (north-east and

).

Reliance maintains that it is “committed to pursue the world’s leading mobile technologies, whether CDMA or GSM, to provide the best and competitive services to our many million customers”. Reliance Communications runs GSM services through a subsidiary, Reliance Telecom.

Will Reliance then ride two horses at the same time? A source in the GSM camp said that Reliance may progressively tone down the CDMA focus. The company may target additional growth in GSM, he said.

Over a period of time, it may even look at shifting its CDMA subscriber base to the GSM platform, the source added.

Subsequently, introduction of dual mode world-phones (common for GSM and CDMA) in

will make things easier, he claimed. Another industry insider, however, argued that Reliance would not leave CDMA, where it has such a strong subscriber base.

“A dealer who sells all kinds of products is the best dealer,” he said. The company’s aim seems to be to multiply faster than others so that it becomes the top player in the country.

There are four reasons for Reliance’s strategy shift. One, thanks to handset limitations, higher-end users tend to prefer GSM, especially since international roaming is better on GSM.

Two, GSM operators continue to bill about 40% more than CDMA subscribers, indicating that they have better pricing power.

Three, by offering both CDMA and GSM, Reliance can design different schemes targeting different segments of the market.

And for, GSM is by far the dominant technology worldwide and in

, outnumbering CDMA 2.5:1 in

.

The evidence from circles where Reliance offers both CDMA and GSM suggests that one does not cannibalise the other. In the six circles where both are available (MP,

, Kolkata,, Orissa and Himachal), Reliance has 3.5 million subscribers and 2.1 million GSM ones.

The GSM subscriber base is much higher, both in

and globally, thereby making it logical for Reliance Communications to focus on GSM technology, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers’ associate director Arpita Pal Agrawal.

“The economies of scale are much better in the case of GSM,” she said. She also pointed out that while CDMA is very effective for high-speed data applications, the current Reliance base includes a large number of low-cost customers.

As for government policy, a senior official in the department of telecommunications (DoT) told DNA Money that “licences are technology neutral”.

He gave this reply when asked whether Reliance required to surrender some of its CDMA spectrum to expand in the GSM space. However, there are concerns within the government and the industry over the additional spectrum allocation sought, as spectrum is considered a scarce resource.

Also, a senior representative of DoT recently told the media, “the government policy is not to shut doors (on any player)”. He added that BSNL and MTNL also offered both GSM and CDMA in some common circles.

Interestingly, Reliance Communications is learnt to have told DoT recently that its decision to expand in GSM is linked to government’s teledensity target.

The company indicated that it aimed to have the largest marketshare in the Indian telecom sector by 2010 end, and that it must opt for GSM expansion to reach there, according to sources.

While communications minister Dayanidhi Maran has set a target of 250 million phone connections by the end of 2007 and 500 million by the end of 2010, Reliance Communications is understood to be eyeing anything between 110 million and 125 million subscribers by then, representing a marketshare of around 25%.

Even as the CDMA growth has been robust, in terms of absolute numbers it is nowhere near GSM. As against 1,820 million GSM users across the world as of March, 2006, CDMA had only 250 million subscribers, excluding the 3G user base.

If 3G users are taken into account, the GSM base has crossed 2 billion and CDMA 318 million.

In

, GSM is way ahead with 86.6 million users, while CDMA has managed over 35 million, including its wireline and fixed wireless subscribers.

GSM players in

include Bharti, Hutch, Idea and BSNL, while Reliance Telecom has over 2 million GSM users in eight circles. CDMA is represented mainly by Reliance Communications and Tata Teleservices.

From December, 2001, to December, 2002, the CDMA base in

grew 125%, against 92.5% in GSM during the corresponding period. From December, 2002, to December, 2003, CDMA recorded a growth of 800% against 110.5% in GSM.

(It was in December, 2002, that Reliance launched its CDMA service). From December, 2003, to 2004, the CDMA growth rate was 75.3%, against 70.3% in GSM. From December, 2004, to 2005, CDMA showed a growth of 76%, against 56.8% in GSM. However, from December, 2005, to May, 2006, the CDMA growth rate has been lower at 26% against 28.5 per cent in GSM.

Global numbers also indicate a better growth trajectory for CDMA, as opposed to GSM.

From the fourth quarter of 2001 to the corresponding period in 2002, CDMA growth rate was 819.4% against 46.3% in GSM. From Q4 of 2002 to Q4 of 2003, CDMA recorded a growth rate of 158%, against 25% in GSM.

From Q4 of 2003 to Q4 of 2004, the global CDMA user base grew 70.9% against 28% in GSM. From Q4 of 2004 to Q4 of 2005, the CDMA growth rate was 54.1% against 31.8% in GSM.

From the fourth quarter of 2005 to the end of first quarter of 2006, the CDMA growth rate was 11.2% against 6.4% in GSM. The 3G figures have not been taken into account for calculating the global growth rate in GSM and CDMA.

Source- http://www.dnaindia.com

Technorati : , , , , , , ,
Ice Rocket : , , , , , , ,